It’s awesome that
two of the books we have read this semester in a class about The Hero’s Journey
have been centered around race conflicts. The intersection between racism and
what it means to be a hero is one filled with ideas that merit meaningful
discussion. Often books written about race are overlooked unless one is in a
class that is designed specifically to discuss them. The applicability of those
books we read to more than just conflicts regarding race is important to
discuss: Gaines’ A Lesson Before Dying and
Mansbach’s Angry Black White Boy both
involve idea that definitely go beyond the scope a class just about, for
instance, African-American Literature. Unfortunately, seeing books about race in
classes that do not have race as a focus is even rarer outside Uni. If you were
to look up ‘best writers’ on google, the proportion of black writers is
miniscule next to the proportion of white writers. Mr. Mitchell is vastly
enriching our perception of the world of literature by introducing us to black writers,
and allows us to have conversations that change our understanding of the world.
Last semester I
took African-American Literature. It was an amazing class that opened my eyes
to a diverse range of books that I likely would not have picked up on my own,
and I think I am a better and more informed person for it. However, looking at
books like Gaines’ A Lesson Before Dying and
Mansbach’s Angry Black White Boy from
the perspective of analysis regarding a hero’s journey, I have realized
something that I missed before. My African-American Literature blog post
way back in November argued that although Hurston may have been conveying an
accurate depiction of life of African-Americans in the south, her book may
serve to promote racial stereotypes rather than to change them. However, I now realize
that what I found so strange then was that her book was the only book by a
black author I had read that didn’t focus on race. Race played a subtler role
in the book, and it wasn’t huge and in your face like the other books by black
writers. I now think maybe that was her point: to create a book that broke the
norm of black writers writing about race.
Then the question
is, why don’t we see more black writers following the path of writing books
that do not focus on race? Well, that isn’t that hard to answer: not only are
the problems regarding race interesting to talk about, they affect almost
everyone, even white people. Also, inspiration for writing often comes from a
personal connection to an idea, which is defiantly true for any person who experiences
the effects of entrenched oppression daily. Because topics about race are so
interesting and important to discuss, they end up becoming the core of novels
written by black writers.
And this is where
I see a problem. Themes about race outcompete others for discussion. In our
classes while we were reading Gaines’ A
Lesson Before Dying or Mansbach’s Angry
Black White Boy were completely dominated by discussion about race rather
than discussion about the hero’s journey. Yes, we did talk about the hero’s
journey regarding Mansbach’s Angry Black
White Boy, but we spent a much greater proportion of the time on talking
about race. Most of the days spent on Mansbach’s Angry Black White Boy were more reminiscent of my African-American
Literature class than one about the Hero’s Journey. That is not to say that
those books are only about race: Angry Black White Boy is an amazing
satire of the hero’s journey that merits weeks rather than days of discussion. But
though we did talk more about the hero’s journey when discussing Angry Black White Boy than A Lesson Before Dying, through no fault
of our own, we ended up mainly talking about race. Isn’t ironic that other than
the book that purposely breaks the mold, Mansbach’s Angry Black White Boy is the only one on race that is written by a
white person? I think this dynamic can be generalized to in part explain the lack
of black writers in classrooms or on ‘best writer’ lists. Books by black
authors are almost solely talked about in terms of race, so they are sort of
set aside in their own category.
What do you think
(if you made it this far)? Are most books by black writers only discussed in
terms of their comments about race? Is there an invisible veil that blinds us
to topics other than racism? Are there invisible chains that bind black writers
to the topics of racism?
I agree with your comments on _Their Eyes Were Watching God_ as Hurston's effort to write a novel that wasn't centered on race, and I think it was definitely an effort to break the norms. However, I don't think that those norms of black writers writing books about race was a detriment, as you're implying. In African-American Lit last semester, each new book made me consider new ideas and perspectives I would never have found on my own, and I think that was the writers' intention. In our class discussions both this semester and last semester in African-American lit a lot of people commented on how a key difference between white people and black people is the fact that white people can choose when to care about race issues, while black people are forced to care about those issues constantly because it constantly affects them. As a white person it is easy and tempting to try and sweep race issues under the rug, maybe dismiss it all as a problem solved in the sixties, and if these influential books hadn't been written (or if they had been written about topics other than race), it would be even easier. None of these books were entirely, completely, about race either; they each had themes of family, coming of age, and searching for life's meaning, that we can all relate to. It's just that they also showed how influential race is in relation to those themes, forcing the reader to consider the real influence of racism.
ReplyDeleteThanks for commenting! What you are saying makes a lot of sense. I guess I can't really speak for a black writer, but I would feel a bit trapped if I could only write about race. Maybe I'm wrong about that though.
DeleteI agree with what both of you are saying. They say to write what you know, and African-American writers (especially in the early-mid 20th century) certainly knew a lot about systemic racism and oppression. The works that those writers produced are incredibly important, as they give a powerful voice to an oppressed minority and start discussions about race. However, I think that it is important not to focus too much on any single aspect of a book. It's impossible for a novel to only be about racism (or any single theme, for that matter), and it only limits our understanding of literature to assume otherwise.
DeleteI would argue that a discussion of the hero's journey in _A Lesson Before Dying_ is always *also* a discussion about race, and the two are inseparable: Jefferson's entire predicament is entangled with race, as Grant makes clear in the opening paragraph of the novel, and the whole question of what makes it "heroic" for him to comport himself with pride and dignity under these conditions is a conversation about race. (As is the discussion of heroism w/r/t Jackie Robinson, which the novel engages us in.) The whole time we were talking about why it matters for Jefferson to walk to the chair--how his actions can symbolically resist years of white supremacy--we were talking both about the hero's journey in the context of race and American history. I wouldn't know how to talk about the hero's journey separately from race, with this novel, just as it's not possible to talk about the hero's journey in _As I Lay Dying_ without talking about class.
ReplyDeleteBut what keeps African American writers off things like the "list of the greatest writers of all time" is in part that discussions about books involving race are center around racism, and are therefore put in a separate category. While it may be true that it is impossible to talk about the hero's journey in _A Lesson Before Dying_ without talking about race, it is also true that most of our discussions of that book were also almost totally about race.
DeleteJefferson overcame oppression by walking up to his execution dignity. The reader follows his heroic journey of overcoming oppression.
ReplyDeleteFor people of color, their experiences as a POC in America is a part of their identity, and I don't think that means we should assume that a book that includes a discussion of race is only a book about race (and if so, what's so wrong with that?).
Everyone encounters stuff they must overcome, and that's the whole point of the hero's journey. Odysseus had to go back home. Jack had to escape Room and adjust to Outside. Jefferson had to overcome the racist oppression in his town. They all had obstacles to overcome, and just because Gaines' novel is about race, it doesn't mean that the race discussion overpowered our discussion on heroism.
Perhaps we shouldn't be wondering why black writers write about their own personal experiences, and wonder why people aren't reading more of them to be included on high ranking writing lists.
I agree with you completely. I too think that we should not assume that a book that includes a discussion about race is only about race. I too wondered why people aren't reading more of them. I realized that the reason people do not read more of them is because of that very assumption: that a book about race is only about race. More than anything else, people just want to read a story that they can relate to, and a book they think is only about race doesn't fit the bill.
DeleteI think the main problem people are having is that everyone wants to seem to categorize the books -- to define them either as "about race" or "not about race". I think trying to make this generalization is problematic in itself, and rather we should be focusing on the intersections between race and other elements of the book, and also, of course, be reading more books by POC in general.
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with you. We stereotype books based on false assumptions, leading to the subtlety of the author being overlooked.
DeleteRace is inseparable from identity, the only difference is that white people are so used to not paying attention to it. Any black character that doesn't acknowledge and break a stereotype ends up being assumed to fit it, but only for black authors. In class some people defended Mansbach's right to write black characters because they weren't caricatures of black people. But were this book written by a black author, more likely than not people would find a problem with the author feeding into one stereotype or another. Historically, the study or race and racism has been left to POC and it largely still is. And thus someone like Mansbach is a novelty to most of us. None of these books are "about race." But race is part of our lives and who we are and thus a part of these books. And white writers who ignore that and don't address race in their works are just showing how limited their perspective really is.
ReplyDeleteDon't know what you mean by, "None of these books are 'about race.'" _A lesson Before Dying_ and _Angry Black White Boy_ are definitely about race.
DeleteI agree that it is problematic to not care about race or to bucket every text by not-white people into the "about race" category, but I don't think that is entirely relevant to this book. I don't mean to take the piss too much, but it's called "Angry Black White Boy", clues in the name that it wants to be all about race and so I don't think it's too problematic that our discussion was focused around that.
DeleteI don't think that it is possible to separate race and the concept of a "hero's journey." People of color have to deal with race everyday, and race is very intertwined into the hero's journey. I think Ellie A brings up an important idea that books about race cause people to look at race from a new perspective.
ReplyDelete